Re: Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II VS Canon EF 24โ105mm f/4L IS II. I have all three lenses mentioned and I would suggest either the 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II or a combo of the Canon EF 24โ105mm f/4L IS II and the EF 35mm f/1.4 II.
Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM: Build and handling . The Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM is longer than its DSLR counterpart, the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM, which measures 113mm. Still, the two lenses are comparable in size โ and the RF iteration retains the 82mm diameter of its predecessor, meaning that you can port over your existing
In the EF mount, the 24-70mm f/4 is $200 cheaper, has 0.7x max magnification* compared to the 24-105mm f/4 mkII's 0.24x, is almost 200g lighter, and is an inch shorter. Apparently those are sufficient advantages to a sufficient number of photographers to keep this lens in production.
Compare Canon EF 24-70mm f 4L IS USM Lens vs Canon EF 24-105mm f 4L IS II USM Lens vs Canon EF 70-300mm f 4-5.6L IS USM Lens Press ? ? Enter ? for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers
In the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II vs. 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM Lens specifications comparison, we find the f/4L IS II with a shorter minimum focus distance (39.37 vs. 47.24" / 1000mm vs. 1200mm) for a higher maximum magnification (0.27x vs. 0.21x). The f/4L IS II has a higher-rated image stabilization system (5 stops vs. 3.5) and it also
ๆๅญๅฝขๅ
ๅๅถ็. Canon EF 24-70mm F/4L IS USM. ็ฑปไผผๆผๅ
ๅๅถ็็ๆฐ้๏ผๅญๅฝขๅ็ๅฝฑๅๅ
็บฟ้่ณๆๅ
ๅจไธ็ๆนๅผใ. ๅญๅฝขๅ็๏ผๅพๅพๅชๆๆดๆ่ดต็้ๅคด็จไธ๏ผๆนๅๅคฑ็ฆๅบๅ็ๅค่งใ. ่ฟๅฏไปฅ่ฎฉๆจ็็
ง็็่ตทๆฅๆดๅฅฝใๆดๆๅ็่ๆฏ่ๅใ. ๅ
ๅๅถ็. 9. ๅ
ๅๆงๅถๆๅคๅฐๅ
็บฟ
Ea2iqHS. m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/373m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/945m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/765m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/525m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/677m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/71m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/659m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/457m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/700m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/334m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/733m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/897m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/832m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/699m7v7p7kijs.pages.dev/607
canon ef 24 70mm f 4l is usm vs 24 105 ii
